Commenting on news that the expected takeover of British Energy by French energy company EDF has fallen through, Nathan Argent, head of Greenpeace's nuclear campaign, said:

"This is a hammer blow for Brown's deluded nuclear ambitions. If this deal had gone ahead, it would have been a disaster for renewable energy in the UK. A push for more nuclear power would scupper the UK renewable energy industry, and, by doing so, cancel out the prospect of creating hundreds of thousands of British green-collar jobs. 

"Now is the time for Brown to show some courage. This is his chance to make the decision to finally ditch the government's failing nuclear policy.

"A report out today by independent energy experts shows that if we meet the 2020 renewable energy target, we'll close the energy gap and cut emissions by almost 40 per cent. If Brown has any bottle, this is his perfect chance to show it.

"This takeover would have taken us back to the old days of a state-subsidised, monopolised nuclear power sector. The French government, via EDF, would have the monopoly, while the British government, via the taxpayer, would have shelled out subsidies to the tune of billions."

ENDS

Greenpeace press office: 020 7865 8255

The French nuclear safety agency, ASN, has ordered construction to be suspended on the new nuclear reactor being built in France - the same model that would most likely be built in the UK. (1)

Flamanville's construction in northern France has run into the same kinds of problems plaguing the ongoing construction of the only other European Pressurised Reactor (EPR), Olkiluoto 3, in Finland.

The move by ASN follows the agency's discovery of chronic problems affecting the quality of construction work since building work commenced on Flamanville 3 in December 2007.

ASN's call to halt construction follows a series of letters from the agency to Flamanville's construction manager. In the letters, ASN inspectors highlighted a range of problems including non-conformities in the pinning of the steel framework of the concrete base slab, incorrectly positioned reinforcements, and inadequacy of technical inspections by both the construction companies and Electricité de France (EDF).

Inspectors also uncovered inconsistencies between the blueprint for reinforcement work and the plan for its practical implementation. (2) The incorrect composition of concrete had been used, that may lead to cracks and rapid deterioration. Samples of concrete were also not collected properly, according to ASN. (3)

Cracks have already been observed at part of the base slab beneath the reactor building. The supplier of the steel containment liner reportedly lacks the necessary qualifications. Fabrication of the liner was continuing despite quality failures demonstrating the lack of competence of the supplier. As a result, one-quarter of the welds of the steel liner of the reactor containment building were deficient. (4)

Ben Ayliffe, head of Greenpeace's nuclear campaign, said: "The only two EPRs being built today are construction fiascos. The one in Finland is years behind schedule and billions over budget and only six months into the project in France building work has come screeching to a halt.

"This reactor design is fast becoming a by-word for incompetence, massive delays, spiralling costs and dodgy engineering. We only have a limited time and budget to stave off the most catastrophic effects of climate change and we should stop pouring money down the nuclear black hole."

Olkiluoto has been under construction for three years but has been blighted ever since the concrete was poured. Poor quality concrete, bad welds on the containment liner and low-quality reactor components are among its problems. The schedule for completion has been put back by more than two years and costs have nearly doubled to over 5 billion euros.

ENDS

Greenpeace press office: 020 7865 8255

Notes:

(1) Mr Smith from the local division of ASN interviewed by French channel 3 this lunchtime, also quoted in the French local paper Ouest-France: "Le coulage du béton de l'EPR suspendu - Suite à une injonction de l'ASN (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire) qui a constaté une nouvelle anomalie dans le ferraillage de l'îlot qui supportera le future réacteur nucléaire, EDF vient de suspendre le coulage du béton. Le chantier est donc interrompu pour correction et vérification."

(2) ASN letter, 12 March 2008.

(3) ASN letter, 25 January 2008.

(4) ASN letter, 19 February 2008.

Reacting to the news that the UK government is to sell more of its stake in British Energy, Greenpeace Senior Climate and Energy campaigner Ben Ayliffe said:

"This decision is all about readying the UK energy market for a new generation of nuclear power stations. And whilst it makes penniless British Energy look a lot more attractive to potential investors like EDF and E.On, you have to wonder whether the government is pre-judging the conclusions of its own nuclear consultation announced last week. Before making any decision on whether to press ahead with new nuclear power stations the government is legally obliged to consult fully with the public. But if they intend to do this, why are they priming the energy market for nuclear before the consultation has even started?”

For more information please call the Greenpeace press office on 0207 865 8255

Nuclear companies across Europe warned to expect similar disruption

Thirty anti-nuclear campaigners, including five from the UK, have halted the building of a new nuclear reactor in France – and warned that any new nuclear reactors built in the UK can expect similar treatment.

On the twenty-first anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, the activists from Greenpeace used trucks to block the entrance to the construction site at Flamanville in northern France and occupied cranes and other building equipment.

In the UK, existing nuclear sites are considered the most likely to be earmarked as locations for new nuclear reactors. These include:

• Dungeness in Kent;
• Hinkley Point in Somerset;
• Bradwell in Essex;
• Sizewell in Suffolk;
• Heysham in Lancashire;
• Oldbury in Gloucestershire;
• Sellafield in Cumbria.
  

The reactor under construction, known as a European Pressurized Water Reactor, is the most likely type to be proposed for the UK. There are grave concerns over the safety of these untried and untested new reactors.

The French energy company Electricité de France – known in the UK as EDF – is behind the new reactor construction and are known to favour building similar reactors in the UK.

Nathan Argent, Greenpeace nuclear campaigner, said: “No-one should expect that the action taken today to halt construction of this completely unnecessary nuclear reactor will be a one-off.

“If new nuclear power stations are given the go-ahead in the UK then their construction will be disrupted.

“Nuclear power is a dangerous distraction from implementing real solutions to climate change. There are much safer, more reliable and significantly cheaper approaches such as increased energy efficiency, renewable power technologies and the decentralising of our electricity and energy systems.”

A recent report by the Flood Hazard Research Centre showed that many nuclear sites are at risk from significant sea level rises and storm surges in the future and are not suitable locations for new nuclear reactors.

ENDS

Greenpeace press office: 020 7865 8255